How to prevent your own “Eurostar moment”

 In social media

No doubt many people around the world are aware that Eurostar passengers were subjected to some fairly uncomfortable experiences over the weekend as 5 Eurostar trains broke down as they entered the Channel Tunnel.

The issue seems to be the rapid change of temperature a the trains entered the channel tunnel from the French side (freezing conditions outside the tunnel and the 25 degrees celsius inside).

The story “broke” on social media via Tech Crunch on Saturday morning via their post “As hundreds of Eurostar passengers languish, Eurostar ignores Twitter

You can also see how traditional media such as the BBC reported the incident.

UK social media agency We Are Social posted a note about today’s Eurostar crisis on Sunday to summarise how they were helping with the response as Eurostar are one of their clients.

In a refreshingly honest post, MD Robin Grant mentioned that they had actually suggested a real-time listening team to Eurostar and will be implementing this in early 2010 – as Robin posted below:

When we first met with Eurostar, as we do with all of our clients, we talked to them about the need for to put a real-time social media listening and responding programme and crisis plan in place, and proposed a conversation audit and consultancy project to help them implement such a programme. As is common with any business at the early stages of coming to terms with social media, they could see the long term benefits of such a strategy, however as adapting their existing processes had wider implications across the business they decided to start small by moving forward with the Little break, Big difference campaign, to learn from the experience of engaging in conversations in social media.

Interestingly people (on social media) are calling We are Social the “Eurostar PR agency” – this is probably not correct but it shows you that on social media people are not only hungry for information but also quick to blame (and that blame can be amplified quickly on sites like twitter).

In a review of the whole situation, perhaps Robin and the team at We Are Social could have quickly tweeted “we’re camped here inside Eurostar HQ getting you info as soon as we can” – to let people know they are on the case.

There is nothing more reassuring to hear the wailing sirens of a the police/fire brigade or ambulance crew nearby to know that help is on its way – and it is time to keep clear and let the professionals do their work.

In this case, the sirens were off while everyone attended to the crisis, but Robin would not be defending his agency had he publicly put the sirens on.  This is not a criticism, but a key take-out to all the rest of us should we find ourselves or a client in a similar situation in the future.

One of the key observations of social media (and the web in general) is that now information is so freely available, sites like twitter can completely bypass armies of PR people.

The public can now easily sense if information is being withheld and therefore start to criticise those withholding it (or anyone else close by).  It is advisable then to be as transparent as possible via all mediums, and if you don’t know what is going on – say why – and suggest a reason.

For example, it has come to light that some of the communication issues were because of tunnel protocol where all incidents are under the control of Eurotunnel.  Compounding this is the fact that there are no mobile phone services in the channel tunnel – so citizen journalism is blacked out and we need to wait for the standard chain of command to update us – at the same time as they are effecting a rescue.

So what are the key learnings from this experience (and yes Mr/ Mrs/ Ms Communications Director of any size company you need to read this also):

  • Social media is not simply an extension of PR.  Consumers hungry for information (and passengers in this case) as well as relatives waiting to hear about their loved ones stranded under the English channel on a train with no lights, power want regular, factual updates.  They can’t wait for a PR release to be written, approved by 2 layers of management, then provided to media outlets who need to format it for their channels and finally get it to air. Therefore because of the immediacy and direct nature of social media (it bypasses PR and traditional media) – you need to be fast and frequent with the updates.

Why not station someone in the operations team who is running the twitter channel in a crisis like this?

  • Claim your brand on twitter @eurostar is not currently owned by Eurostar, but in a crisis people wanting information will Google your brand to find your website, or go to twitter to try and find you.  @little_break is the only channel being managed for updates by the Eurostar/We Are Social team – easy to guess this one! This brings me to my next point
  • Leverage all channels together. As of today, Sunday there is still no mention on the main website of the @little_break twitter feed to check.  If you are on your mobile and at a railway station you also would want to access information via your mobile.  Eurostar do not have a mobile optimised website and when I checked at 12 noon on Sunday, on a mobile you still had to navigate through the country choice dropdown before you get to the service disruption message.

  • Update early and update often – but get the information from the source.  The issue affecting passengers was an operational issue – so get the updates from the operations team – not filtered by the PR or marketing teams.

Dave Black said in a post back in September, and is completely relevant in this Eurostar case:

The answer isn’t marketing in the awareness sense, although that’s an important part. The real answer is operations, the place within an organization (often along with product management) where goods and services are created and delivered.

Marketing sets the expectation, marketing creates demand, marketing helps a consumer differentiate why one choice is better than another choice.

Operations delivers

Any gap between the two drives a conversation on the social web.

Over the last few months, I have struck company after company who KNOW they need to get into social media (as Robin’s quote showed about Eurostar), but they are not sure HOW.

The barriers faced (in no particular order) seem to be

  • The PR department “is already doing this”
  • We don’t have any budget
  • We are not sure how many resources we will need
  • We’ll be looking into it next year
  • We have a few loud bloggers we wish would “go away” so we’ll do nothing and hope they do go away

Each of these statements deserves deeper analysis and will be the subject of a later blog post.

For now – let’s see what we can learn from the “Eurostar 19-12 incident” and use this as a template to help educate clients about what can happen when you think you should be doing something in social media, but don’t follow through.

As Rachel Clarke points out correctly, this is a communications failure not a social media failure, however all of the noise on social media (funny that) has pointed the finger at social media.

I try not to point fingers, because they can easily be pointed back at me – and also I’m keen that we as an industry learn from this and also use it as a catalyst to promote genuine discussions with brands wavering about adopting social media.

I am sure in many meetings this week and into new year they will be discussing this and ways to avoid their own “Eurostar moment” in 2010.

For one – you need to

LISTEN > LEARN > ENGAGE > INTEGRATE and mind the social media gap.

Follow my updates on twitter @andrewgrill

While you are here ...


London-based Practical Futurist and former IBM Global Managing Partner, Andrew is a popular and sought-after presenter and commentator on issues around digital disruption and emerging technologies. He is a multiple TEDx & International Keynote Speaker. Watch his speaking showreel here, enquire about availability & fees here or listen to his latest Podcast - "The Practical Futurist Podcast" on your favourite app.

Showing 7 comments
  • Craig McGill

    Andrew, a good post – and I posted similar thoughts and pointers over on my own site at – but the one thing that’s fair to remember is that We Are Social weren’t hired by Eurostar for crisis comms (or even day to day social media integration with traditional PR), they seem to have been on board for promoting getaways, so it’s harsh to have a go at them for this.

    Having said that, it may well be that the client just didn’t want to say anything or put anything out via these channels, which you can totally appreciate WAS not pointing out to people.

  • Andrew Grill

    Craig, I’m actually in support of We Are Social – they have rolled up their sleeves and jumped right in – without a brief or even a purchase order.

    How many other “traditional agencies” would do the same over a weekend and go beyond the call of duty.

    Hats off to them for showing how as an industry we can respond quickly and help get the message out to the people that need it.

    As with anything, a crisis tests every procedure and helps make things better for next time.

    The real failing here is the Eurostar/Eurotunnel (traditional) communication efforts.

    This should be the focus of any enquiry. Robin and the team should come out of this looking good and with lots of new business in 2010 in my view.

    If as you suggest Eurostar may have been withholding information (and we may never know), then we are back to the old ways of PR and it is hard for Social Media (and the We Are Social team) to fight against this somewhat traditional approach of PR which is to contain the message.

    This was my real point – social media promotes transparency which goes against standard PR training.

    The irony is not lost on the term “public relations” which is really another name for “media management”.

    Social media does not afford this luxury so brands and companies need a different approach.

    With social media, it’s all about Listen > Learn > Engage > Integrate.

    You have to start to listen and then engage to get anywhere and this is frankly painful for brands, so we should not beat them up, but instead help them make the transition.

    Remember the web 10 years ago…. “do we really need a website?” was the standard response.

    Now it’s “so do we need a social media strategy?”. People that ask this of me going forward will be given a 1 word response.


  • Rich Baker

    Hi Andrew. Great post and I agree generally. However, the point around the agency feeling the need to defend their actions publicly (and instead expose their client as the one making the error of judgement) doesn’t sit well with me. They should have sucked up the criticism, and responded to feedback from the public and other social media commentators.
    The most important thing in all of this is the reputation of the client, Eurostar. That’s what WOM is all about isn’t it! 🙂

  • St Pancras..Eurostar

    The Eurotrain services have had to be reduced again because of the snow. Not cancel, mind! We missed the latest problems, even though we went to Brussels for the weekend. All the main station websites have been excellent for info, like and that.

  • Dara Bell

    This would appear to a reworking of the original PR of the Tunnel. I was meant to speak with John Pike who did the communications on the Tunnel Project.

    It has been poor since the inspeption. With large public projects some people get it right London Olypic bid and some get it wrong. Oh and do not mention the Dome. I think they will learn the hard way through the negative plublicity, which you refer to. Others seem to feel this on the comments, I mean how much does a Twitter cost, nil preux.

  • Andrew Grill

    Just received the following from Simon Redfern at Eurostar – hats off for the admission of errors and desire to fix.

    Name: Simon Redfern
    email: simon.redfern
    message: Hello

    You posted on your blog about the Eurostar trains that broke down in December, and made the point about the need for better communication with our passengers.

    I thought you might be interested to see a copy of the Independent Review into the events, and our response which has just been published.

    You can find our response here together with a visual representation of what happened on the day.

    We are extremely sorry for what happened, and take the situation very seriously. We’ve already taken action to address many of the Review’s recommendations, and we are committed to implementing all of its recommendations as quickly as possible. Above all we are focused on:

    Improving passenger care in disruption
    Improving communications, and
    Strengthening the resilience of our trains

    The Eurostar communications team will be providing information and updates at @eurostarcomms where we’ll be working closely with @little_break and @creamoflondon. You’ll find us making corporate announcements there as well as reporting back should there be any key service updates.

    I hope you have time to look at the review findings, particularly on the communications side of things. If you have any thoughts please don’t hesitate to let me know.

    All the best

    Simon Redfern

  • Anthony McLean

    How is it no-one got the sack for this? (i.e. Richard Brown)

    NOTE : This isn’t about the mechanical issues, its about a total lack of foresight and responsiveness to previous failures.

    The 2008 chunnel fire was fair/ample warning that “no plan was in place”.

    Its unrealistic to expect the same management, who created this failed system, to be skilled enough to fix it…. or for that matter to deserve a second chance.

Leave a Comment